How a South Carolina personal injury firm turned 198 focus groups into $33 million in added settlement value.
Is the offer on the table a good one? Every personal injury lawyer hears this question from a client, and the honest answer is usually some version of “nobody knows what a jury will do.” Dirk Derrick gave clients the same answer for 30 years and came to regard the answer as weak (his word). So, he went and got the data himself.
Dirk founded Derrick Law Firm Injury Lawyers, PC in Conway, South Carolina, in 1991. Today the firm has 33 attorneys, 10 offices, and six in-house courtrooms built for running focus groups on live cases. I sat down with him on the Trial Lawyer View by Synergy podcast to talk about case valuation, jury data, and where AI fits inside a plaintiff practice.
One Case in 2015 Changed the Demand Package
In 2015 Dirk had a large pedestrian injury case with a police report blaming his client and witnesses who all sided with the defense. He ran four focus group juries in one day, then did something he had never done before: he interviewed each juror on camera afterward and asked why they decided the way they did.
All four juries went for the plaintiff. Dirk put the deliberation footage and the interviews into his demand package and sent the whole package to the insurer. He admits he was scared of what he was handing over. The defense lawyer told him the number was not unreasonable, and the case settled without a trial.
Until then, Dirk had one tool. In his words: “The only leverage is, hey, if you don’t like what we’re paying you, file a lawsuit, we see it at the courthouse.”
The defense responded by running three focus groups of their own. One agreed with Dirk’s numbers, one came in higher, and one returned a defense verdict. Dirk’s view is he does not mind if his data sends the other side looking for their own truth.
The Numbers Behind the Method
Dirk’s data manager pulled the results the week before the recording. Across 198 cases where an offer was on the table before the focus group:
Settlements averaged 2.7 times the original offer.
The average increase per case was $169,190.
Total added settlement value came to almost $33 million.
Dirk is candid about the averages hiding some losers. On some of those 198 cases the panel confirmed the insurer’s offer was close to real value. The money, he says, is in the six figure cases, where a $150,000 offer looks reasonable and the panel values the case at $400,000.
Uncertainty Is the Pressure Point
Dirk describes four points of pressure the defendant/insurer uses against plaintiffs: time, money, uncertainty, and knowledge. I asked him which one moves the other side.
“Removing uncertainty is the biggest leverage in case negotiations.”
Your client asks whether the offer is good. You tell them to wait, and they ask for a guarantee you are in no position to give. Twelve individual verdict forms from a focus group replace a guess with data points, and the client then lets you push harder. On the other side of the table, the adjuster sees bad faith exposure instead of an empty threat. In South Carolina (a bad faith state), Dirk pairs the focus group results with a policy limits demand and a short deadline to pay.
The Firm Rule: All the Money or Focus Group the Case
Derrick Law Firm has a settlement policy. If a case involves any of the following, the lawyer must either collect the full policy limits or run a focus group before settling:
Any permanent injury, even a 5 percent impairment rating
Any conduct a jury might call reckless, including a statutory violation like running a red light or talking on a phone
Any contested liability
Those are the three issues insurers push back on hardest, and the rule removes the temptation to accept a decent offer on a case worth far more. The fender benders and small cases still settle on the facts.
Jury Data Beats Juror Stereotypes
Every participant who walks into one of Dirk’s courtrooms answers 107 questions on demographics, life experience, and beliefs. More than 11,000 people have gone through the program and 28,000 have signed up.
The data has overturned beliefs Dirk held for decades. In one trial the model said conservative business owners, men between 50 and 60, were the best plaintiff jurors for a case with strong liability, serious injuries, and a credible plaintiff. He had struck those men his whole career. This time he kept nine of them (he says defense counsel looked at his table like he was having an aneurysm), and the verdict outperformed both focus groups.
The system now sorts jurors issue by issue: liability, actual damages, punitive damages. A juror who is strong on liability might be weak on punitive damages, and if your case needs punitive damages, the data tells you who to keep and who to strike.
AI Drafts, Lawyers Supervise
Dirk’s firm operating model is caseloads sit between 40 and 45 per lawyer, depositions get noticed fast, and every qualifying case gets a focus group. AI lets each person handle more without adding headcount:
· An agent reads the defense’s discovery answers, pulls every named witness, builds a deposition outline for each one, and alerts the paralegal to schedule.
· The same agent runs a deficiency check and drafts the follow up letter.
· Focus group presentation decks dropped from two days of attorney time to about 20 minutes.
One rule holds at the firm, and Dirk states the rule bluntly: send anything to the court prepared by AI and you are fired.
Advice for a Three to Five Lawyer Firm
I asked Dirk what a small firm with no courtroom and no data scientist does in year one. Three answers:
1. Learn how large language models decide which lawyers to recommend. Clients now ask ChatGPT who the best injury lawyer in my area is, and your website and directory listings need to answer.
2. Treat the client experience as the product. You compete against Amazon on speed and service, not the firm down the road. His firm contacts every client every two weeks and sends a personalized gift during the representation.
3. Find the value of your cases. Run your own focus group with people from your community, or hire a service. Dirk’s outside program costs about $12,000, and he waives the fee if the data fails to increase the value.
One caution, and Dirk made the same point on the episode: a focus group is only as good as the facts you bring into the room. Take depositions early, pin down the facts, then test the case.
Where the Profession Goes From Here
Dirk calls this the most uncertain period of his 38-year career and the biggest opportunity he has seen. His warning for firms running a 10 to 20 percent margin: within a few years you will compete for the same marketing-driven cases against firms running 50 or 60 percent. This is where a partner like Synergy can help you increase margin by removing the administrative tasks around healthcare lien identification, verification and resolution from your team.
He has also started helping other lawyers build the same thing, and he wants someone in every state gathering jury data until the plaintiff bar holds a database as deep as the ones the insurance companies already own. Whether enough firms put in the work before the margin gap catches up with them is an open question.
🎧 Listen to the full podcast conversation on Trial Lawyer View here: https://partnerwithsynergy.com/podcast/dirk-derrick/
🔗 Want more insights like this?
If you’re a personal injury lawyer ready to scale, streamline, and step into your role as CEO, let’s talk. Join the Peak Practice Community, and learn how synergy. can help you eliminate settlement bottlenecks, resolve complex liens, and maximize recoveries. Learn more here: https://partnerwithsynergy.com/
If you want to grow and scale your law firm more effectively, consider partnering with Synergy for lien resolution. Learn more at: https://partnerwithsynergy.com/services/lien-resolution/why-partner-with-synergy/