Megan Whiteside on TLV Podcast

In Episode 18 of Trial Lawyer View, TLV host and Synergy CEO Jason D. Lazarus had a lively conversation with Megan Whiteside, a litigation attorney at Brown & Barron, LLC, and host of the Mom Life and Law Podcast. The two discuss her passion for the law and her drive to succeed as a woman in a male-dominated industry. Megan shares her experience growing up and how she knew from a young age that she wanted to be a litigator.

As a working parent, Megan emphasizes the importance of prioritizing passions in life, both personally and professionally. She makes a point to encourage others not to let their role as a parent detract from their dedication to their job. Megan also delves into her experience as a woman in trial law and how it has impacted her career. She discusses the need for law firms to be more inclusive when it comes to gender, and how she has partnered with other women to put on events that advance women in trial law.

Megan also shares her thoughts on the future of the legal profession, particularly in terms of technological advancements. She highlights the importance of embracing change and adapting to new technology to stay relevant and competitive in the field.

Overall, the conversation between Jason and Megan is both informative and inspiring, especially for women looking to make their mark in the legal profession. Megan’s insights serve as a reminder that with determination, hard work, and a strong support system, anything is possible. The episode showcases Megan’s dedication to her craft and her drive to help others succeed in the industry. Listeners are left with a sense of motivation and inspiration to follow their passions and strive for their own success.

Learn more about Megan Whiteside and watch her podcast episode here.

Mark Avera on TLV Podcast

In Episode 17 of Trial Lawyer View, host and Synergy CEO Jason D. Lazarus spoke with Mark Avera of Avera & Smith. The podcast touched upon several interesting topics such as his journey from working as a sheriff’s deputy to following his father’s footsteps as a trial lawyer. They discussed the various challenges he faced in this transition and how his experience as a deputy sheriff helped him become a better trial lawyer.

The conversation then shifted towards Mark’s upcoming work with Trial School, where he is passionate about teaching young lawyers to be ethical and effective trial attorneys. The program focuses on teaching trial advocacy skills to aspiring attorneys, including everything from trial preparation to case presentation. Mark emphasized the importance of providing support and mentorship to young attorneys as they embark on their legal careers.

Mark’s philosophy of “Courage with hope” also emerged as an essential topic of discussion. He believes that courage is essential in the legal profession and it is necessary to maintain hope even in the face of adversity. Mark has represented several clients who were struggling with personal injuries and wrongful death. In such cases, he finds that hope is an essential part of the healing process.

The podcast also explored Mark’s litigation against the tobacco industry, which he pursued with tenacity and dedication. Mark shared his thoughts on the challenges of taking on an industry as large as tobacco, and how he was able to obtain justice for his clients through relentless determination.

Furthermore, Mark talked about how the Wiederhold v. Domino’s Pizza case had a profound impact on his career. This case involved a young man who was struck and killed by a pizza delivery driver. The case highlighted the need for businesses to be responsible for their employees and ensure that they are adequately trained and equipped to do their jobs safely.

Overall, the podcast was an engaging discussion of Mark Avera’s journey as a trial lawyer and his insights into the legal profession. It provided listeners with a glimpse into the passion and dedication that goes into representing clients and seeking justice in the courtroom.

Learn more here.

What Should You Do About Possible Health Insurance Liens?

August 12, 2021

Teresa Kenyon, Esq.

When handling a third-party liability case and you know your client had health insurance that paid the medical expenses, should you check to see if there is a lien interest on the settlement funds? Or maybe you have settled a case and you just received a notice letter from a possible lienholder, what do you do about it?  What about Medicare or other federally governed interests? Do you treat them differently?  These are critical questions to answer prior to disbursing funds to your client.

To read more, download the article below:

[hubspot type=form portal=7609853 id=ac179056-4563-4fc1-937c-343a767766c4]

Teresa Kenyon on TLV Podcast

In Episode 16 of Trial Lawyer View, TLV host and Synergy CEO Jason D. Lazarus had an insightful conversation with Teresa Kenyon, Director of Lien Resolution Services at Synergy Settlement Services. The episode focused on Teresa’s journey in the legal industry, particularly her transition from personal injury law to subrogation law, and how she ultimately became a white hat fighter for injury victims.

Teresa began her career in personal injury law, working for law firms and handling cases on behalf of plaintiffs. She then transitioned to subrogation law, which involved representing health insurance plans seeking reimbursement for medical expenses paid on behalf of injured individuals. Through her work with Rawlings, a subrogation vendor, she saw firsthand the mistakes that personal injury lawyers often make when dealing with recovery contractors.

However, Teresa realized that she wanted to use her legal knowledge and expertise to help injury victims rather than insurers. She decided to make the switch to putting on the “white hat” and fighting subrogation vendors on behalf of injury victims. In her role at Synergy Settlement Services, she helps clients navigate the complex world of lien resolution and recover the maximum amount of their settlement.

During the episode, Teresa and Jason discussed the challenges and misconceptions surrounding lien resolution, and how important it is for personal injury lawyers to understand the process in order to effectively represent their clients. They also discussed the various strategies that can be employed to minimize liens and maximize client recovery.

Teresa’s journey from personal injury law to subrogation law and ultimately to fighting for injury victims reflects her passion for justice and advocacy. Her insights into the complex world of lien resolution and subrogation can be invaluable to personal injury lawyers seeking to navigate these challenging areas of the law and recover the maximum amount for their clients.

Learn more here.

Synergy’s Workers’ Compensation Medicare Secondary Payer Advice Column

July 28, 2021

Rasa Fumagalli JD, MSCC, CMSP-F

Introducing “Since You Asked,” Synergy’s first in a series of columns addressing MSP compliance questions in the area of workers’ compensation.

Question:

“My client is settling her case and does not know what to do with her Workers’ Compensation Medicare Set-Aside (WCMSA) funds. I’m not quite sure what to tell her. Can you help?”

Proper administration of the WCMSA funds is vital in order to ensure that Medicare will become the primary payer once the WCMSA account is depleted. Because of this, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) highly recommends the use of a professional administrator for the funds. In addition, when the WCMSA includes opioids and other “frequently abused drugs”, CMS expects the administration of the funds to be in accordance with CMS’ Part D Drug Utilization Review (DUR) policy.  (WCMSA Reference Guide, Version 3.3, 4/19/2021, Section 17 et al).

If your client would prefer to self-administer her WCMSA account, CMS allows for this as long as she is competent. When your client receives the WCMSA funds, she should deposit the funds in a separate interest-bearing checking account that is insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). The funds should only be used to pay for injury-related Medicare-covered services even if your client is not yet enrolled in Medicare.  The funds may also be used to pay for certain costs that are directly related to the WCMSA account. These consist of costs associated with copying documents, mailing fees/postage, banking fees related to the account, and income tax on interest income from the account. The WCMSA funds may not be used to pay for the following: fees for professionals hired to administer the account, any other expenses for administration of the account, attorney costs for establishing the WCMSA, and Medicare co-payments, deductibles, or premiums.

Record keeping is an important part of the proper administration of the WCMSA. Your client should record all of the transactions with the account and keep itemized receipts for each payment that is made from the account. An annual attestation of the appropriate use of the funds should be sent to Medicare’s Benefits Coordination & Recovery Center. Once the WCMSA account is fully depleted, your client should notify the BCRC of the complete exhaustion so that Medicare may become primary.   CMS has issued a  helpful Self-Administration Toolkit for WCMSAs that details the self-administration process and provides sample documents and letters. The most recent version of the toolkit may be found here.

In the event that your client is also receiving a public income-based benefit, such as Medicaid, it may be appropriate to place the WCMSA in a Special Needs Trust. Synergy’s team of experts is available to guide you and your client through the administration and MSP compliance process.

Ken Hardison on TLV Podcast

In Episode 15 of Trial Lawyer View, TLV host and Synergy CEO Jason D. Lazarus talks with Ken Hardison of Hardison & Cochran and founder of PILMMA, a powerful innovative legal marketing and management association. They discuss how his desire to help people and own his own business led to his career in trial law. As part of our discussion, he talks about how that has transitioned into his love for coaching and mentoring other lawyers. We also discuss the importance of having a team that aligns with your core values along with the three barriers of growth of your law firm.

Learn more here.

Bibi Fell on TLV Podcast

In Episode 14 of Trial Lawyer View, TLV host and Synergy CEO Jason D. Lazarus interviews Bibi Fell of Fell Law, PC. They discuss how even as a child being a lawyer was the only profession for her, the comradery and respect for her network of female trial lawyers, being thrilled by the intellectual challenge of trial law, and her passion for people. They also have a heartfelt discussion about increasing the awareness for hepatoblastoma, an incredibly rare disease that has impacted her family.

Learn more here.

Medicare Compliance – How to be TOTALLY Medicare Compliant

Jason D. Lazarus, J.D., LL.M., MSCC, CSSC

So, what do lawyers assisting Medicare beneficiaries do given all of the issues surrounding representing Medicare beneficiaries?

To learn more, download the White Paper below:

[hubspot type=form portal=7609853 id=3a31fe03-41bd-4455-a882-0b33d31ec2d0]

Exploring Options for Conditional Payment Resolution

July 8, 2021

Rasa Fumagalli JD, MSCC, CMSP-F

Most attorneys are well aware of the need to resolve Medicare’s conditional payments in connection with a client’s settlement. This obligation stems from the Medicare Secondary Payer (MSP) Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1395y(b)(2)(A)(ii), which prohibits Medicare from making payment for medical services when “payment has been made or can reasonably be expected to be made under a workers’ compensation law or plan of the United States or a State or under an automobile or liability insurance policy or plan (including a self-insured plan) or under no fault insurance.” 42 U.S.C. § 1395y(b)(2)(B)(ii). When a primary plan has not made or cannot reasonably be expected to make prompt payment for the service, Medicare may make a payment conditioned upon reimbursement of the payment to the appropriate Medicare Trust Fund. A failure to reimburse the Medicare Trust Fund may result in Medicare filing suit directly for double damages against any or all entities that were responsible for reimbursement of the conditional payments. 42 U.S.C. § 1395y(b)(2)(B)(iii); 42 U.S.C. § 1395y(b)(3). Section 111 of the Medicare, Medicaid, and SCHIP Extension Act of 2007 (MMSEA) Mandatory Insurer Reporting obligations require the primary plan’s Responsible Reporting Entity to report any liability physical trauma settlement involving a Medicare beneficiary that exceeds $750.00. This reporting requirement puts Medicare on notice of the settlement.

Once Medicare is notified of the settlement, a final conditional payment sweep will be completed, and a conditional payment demand will be issued. This demand will only address payments that were made under traditional Medicare Parts A and B. If the Plaintiff was enrolled in a Medicare Advantage Plan, conditional payment information must be requested directly from the plan. This step should not be overlooked since Medicare Advantage Plans have the same recovery rights under the MSP Act as traditional Medicare.

The MSP Act and supporting regulations set out limits on the conditional payment amounts that must be reimbursed to Medicare. If Medicare does not have to take legal action to recover, Medicare is only able to recover the lesser of either “the amount of the Medicare primary payment” or “the full primary payment amount that the primary payer is obligated to pay without regard to any payment, other than a full primary payment that the primary payer has paid or will make, or in the case of a primary payment beneficiary, the amount of the primary payment.” 42 C.F.R. 411.24(c)(1). Section 411.37(d) of the regulations provides: “If Medicare payments equal or exceed the judgment or settlement amount, the recovery amount is the total judgment or settlement payment minus the total procurement costs.” If no procurement costs or attorney’s fees are reflected on the final settlement detail documentation provided to Medicare at the time of settlement, Medicare will not reduce the amount of their conditional payment demand. Attorneys should be aware of this should they seek to reduce or waive their fees.

Addressing Conditional Payments in Liability Cases

As a starting point, it is very important to understand that if the Final Demand is not paid timely, interest begins to accrue regardless of appeals or requests to reduce the amount owed to Medicare.  There is no tolling of the interest meter while you dispute the amount due.  Therefore, it is prudent to make sure that the conditional payment Final Demand is paid timely regardless of how you attempt to reduce the amount owed to Medicare.

The most common method of disputing conditional payments involves a request to remove unrelated charges from the conditional payment demand. The unrelated charges may appear on Medicare’s Payment Summary Form due to a “grouper” error within Medicare’s data collection system. They may also come from comingled billing from the service providers. In cases where the conditional payments are related to the injuries that are being settled, the Plaintiff may end up with very little of a net recovery.

There are two additional conditional payment calculation methods that may be available in certain liability cases. Both the “Self-Calculated Conditional Payment Amount” process and the “Fixed Percentage Option” have specific conditions that must be met before they may be used. The “Self-Calculated Conditional Payment Amount” process is available under the following circumstances: the claim involves an injury caused by physical trauma; the medical treatment was completed at least 90 days before and no further treatment is expected; the total settlement/judgment/award or other payment must be less than $25,000; and the date of the incident must have occurred more than six months prior to the submission of the self-calculated final conditional payment amount. Although the use of this process requires the plaintiff to give up the right to appeal the debt, the plaintiff retains the right to request a waiver of recovery.

The “Fixed Percentage Option” is available for smaller liability settlements. In order to be eligible for this, the following conditions must be met: the liability settlement/judgment/award or other payment must be related to a physical trauma; the total settlement must equal or be less than $5,000; the election of the option must be made within Medicare’s timeframe and prior to the issuance of any conditional payment reimbursement request from Medicare; and there are no other pending settlements, judgments, awards or other payments related to the incident. Additional details regarding the exact processes for both the “Self-Calculated Conditional Payment Amount” and “Fixed Percentage Option” methodologies may be found at the Benefits Coordination and Recovery Center website.

Other options to consider involve payment of the final demand in order to stop the interest on the demand from running (as noted at the start of this section). Once this occurs, the plaintiff may seek a compromise or waiver of the conditional payment debt in order to get Medicare to reduce their conditional payment claim and issue a full or partial refund of the payment. The three statutory provisions that may be used for this are: §1870(c) of the Social Security Act (financial hardship waiver); §1862(b) of the Social Security Act (best interest of the program waiver); and the Federal Claims Collection Act (FCCA) (compromise). The authority to consider beneficiary requests for waivers under §1870(c) of the Act sits with the Benefits Coordination & Recovery Contractor (BCRC), while the authority to waive Medicare claims under §1862(b) and to compromise claims under FCCA, is reserved exclusively to the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). The basis for any waiver request comes from the regulations that provide:

“There shall be no recovery if such recovery would defeat the purposes of this chapter or would be against equity and good conscience.” See 42 U.S.C. § 1395gg(c); 42 C.F.R. 405.355-356; 42 C.F.R. 405.358; 20 C.F.R. 404.506-512; Medicare Secondary Payer Manual, Chapter 7 § 50.

To apply for the “Financial Hardship” waiver, the Medicare beneficiary must file form SSA-632-BK with the BCRC which documents their financial situation. Arguments that may be made in support of this position include showing that the repayment of the conditional payments would deprive the beneficiary of income required for ordinary and necessary living expenses.  If someone is dual eligible, meaning they get both Medicaid and Medicare, it is great evidence of financial hardship since people who qualify for Medicaid have very little in the way of assets.  That being said, even a 7-figure settlement could still be approved for a financial hardship waiver of the amount owed to Medicare.

The “Best Interest of the Program” waiver request under § 1870(b) of the Social Security Act is made to CMS. This rather vague criteria is nowhere further defined and lies completely at the discretion of CMS. Although this request is separate and distinct from a request for a Compromise under the Federal Claims Collection Act (FCCA), it is beneficial to  seek both a request for this waiver and a request for a compromise when seeking a refund from CMS of the amounts the beneficiary has already paid to satisfy the “Final Demand.”

The third and final method for obtaining a refund from Medicare is a Compromise request made to CMS. Authority to grant a Compromise is granted to CMS under the Federal Claims Collection Act (FCCA). 31 U.S.C. § 3711. This section allows Federal agencies the authority to compromise where: the cost of collection does not justify the enforced collection of the full amount of the claim; there is an inability to pay within a reasonable time on the part of the individual against whom the claim is made; or the chances of successful litigation are questionable, making it advisable to seek a compromise settlement.” Medicare Secondary Payer Manual, Chapter 7 § 50.

Conclusion

The resolution of conditional payment reimbursement claims is a time-consuming process. To maximize the plaintiff’s net recovery, it is important to be familiar with the various options for calculating, disputing, and seeking a refund of conditional payments. When addressing conditional payment issues, consider the following best practice tips:

  1. Confirm the type of Medicare coverage your client was enrolled in from the date of the accident to the date of settlement.
  2. Make sure the Final Demand is paid within the time period specified in the recovery demand letter.
  3. Determine if the Self-Calculated Conditional Payment Amount is available in the case.
  4. Determine if the Fixed Percent Option process is available in the case.
  5. Determine if the final conditional payment demand should be disputed.
  6. Provide Medicare with the Final Settlement Details to secure a procurement cost reduction.
  7. Consider whether a full or partial conditional payment refund may be secured in the case.