MEDICARE COMPLIANCE
Welcome to Synergy’s blog page dedicated to the topic of Medicare compliance. Our team of Medicare experts share their InSights and knowledge on the latest developments and best practices for law firms to stay compliant with the MSP. Stay up-to-date with the latest trends and strategies to ensure that you have the information you need to navigate the complex world of Medicare compliance. Our blogs provide practical tips and advice for ensuring that your clients receive the medical care they need while complying with Medicare’s requirements. Let our experts guide you through the intricacies of Medicare compliance and help you stay on top of the latest developments in this rapidly-evolving field.
By Jason D. Lazarus, J.D., LL.M., MSCC, CSCC
Some individuals are “dual eligible” meaning they qualify for both Medicaid and Medicare. In certain cases, a Medicare Set Aside/Special Needs Trust or Pooled Trust Sub-Account may be necessary to preserve the client’s dual eligibility. Medicare Set Asides (“MSA”) are a device used to preserver future Medicare eligibility. When settlement a case it may be prudent to consider setting an MSA when the injury victim is a Medicare beneficiary or reasonably expected to become Medicare eligible within 30 months. A Special Needs Trust or Pooled Special Needs Trust is appropriate for clients receiving Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) and/or Medicaid benefits. Federal law allows creation of either an SNT or Pooled Special Needs Trust to preserve eligibility for needs based benefits, such as SSI and Medicaid, post settlement of a personal injury claim.
Dual eligibility is not extremely common, but there is a subset of the injury population who will be dual eligible. Understanding who qualifies for both Medicaid and Medicare is vitally important for the personal injury practitioner to insure the injury victim’s benefits are adequately protected. By CMS’s definition, dual eligible clients are those that qualify for Medicare Part A and/or Part B and also qualify for Medicaid programs as well. Medicare coverage can be obtained prior to age 65 if an injury victim qualifies for Social Security Disability. It takes a total of 30 months for someone that is disabled to qualify for Medicare (Medicare coverage begins 24 months after the first SSDI check is received which takes 5 months and includes the month of receipt, so plus 1 month).
Some Medicare beneficiaries have so little income or assets that they also qualify for state programs through Medicaid that pay for certain out of pocket expenses not covered by the Medicare program. There are several different programs that injury victims who qualify for Medicaid may be entitled to that help with expenses not covered by Medicare. In addition, there are services that Medicare does not pay for that can be covered by state Medicaid programs. For example, Medicare does not cover nursing home care beyond one hundred days yet Medicaid does, if one qualifies, cover that care.
The programs that cover out of pocket expenses provide limited Medicaid benefits to those that qualify. Through these programs, Medicaid will pay Medicare premiums, co-payments and deductibles within prescribed limits. There are two different programs. First, is Qualified Medicare Beneficiaries (“QMB”). The QMB program pays for the recipients Medicare premiums (Parts A and B), Medicare deductibles and Medicare coinsurance within the prescribed limits. QMB recipients also automatically qualify for extra help with the Medicare Part D prescription drug plan costs. The income and asset caps are higher[i] than the normal SSI/Medicaid qualification limits. Second is Special Low-Income Medicare Beneficiary (“SLMB”). The SLMB program pays for Medicare premiums for Part B Medicare benefits. SLMB recipients automatically qualify for extra help with Medicare Part D prescription drug plan costs. Again, the income and asset caps are higher[ii] than the normal SSI/Medicaid qualification limits.
Preservation of Public Benefits for those who are Dual Eligible
For injury victims that are Medicare eligible or reasonably likely to be within 30 months, a trial lawyer must carefully consider compliance with the Medicare Secondary Payer Act (“MSP”). For those injury victims receiving needs based benefits such as SSI and Medicaid, planning is necessary to preserve those benefits. Federal law found at 42 U.S.C. 1396p, allows for the creation of either a special needs trust or pooled special needs trust for those meeting the Social Security definition of disability. Assets placed into one of these trusts do not count for purposes of qualifying for needs based benefits. In the remainder of the article I will cover Medicare Set Asides and Special Needs Trust along with the intersection of these two public benefit preservation devices.
About Medicare and Medicare Set Asides
Medicare and Social Security Disability Income (hereinafter SSDI) benefits are not income or asset sensitive. If a client meets the Social Security’s definition of disability and has paid in enough quarters they can receive disability benefits without regard to their financial situation. SSDI is funded by the workforce’s contribution into FICA (social security) or self-employment taxes. Workers earn credits based on their work history and a worker must have enough credits to get SSDI benefits should they become disabled (“fully insured”). Medicare is a federal health insurance program. Medicare entitlement commences 2 years after receipt of the first disability payment from Social Security. Medicare coverage is available without regard to a client’s financial situation.
A client who is a current Medicare beneficiary or reasonably expected to become one within 30 months should concern every trial lawyer because of the implications of the MSP. The MSP is a series of statutory provisions enacted during the 1980s as part of the Omnibus Reconciliation Act with the goal of reducing federal health care costs. The MSP provides that if a primary payer exists, Medicare only pays for medical treatment relating to an injury to the extent that the primary payer does not pay.
In certain cases a Medicare Set Aside may be advisable in order to preserve future eligibility for Medicare coverage. A Medicare set aside is a tool that allows an injury victim to preserve Medicare benefits by setting aside a portion of the settlement money in a segregated account to pay for future Medicare covered healthcare. The funds in the set aside can only be used for Medicare covered expenses for the client’s injury related care. Once the set aside account is exhausted, the client gets full Medicare coverage without Medicare ever looking to their remaining settlement dollars to provide for any Medicare covered health care. In certain circumstances, primarily in workers’ compensation settlements, Medicare approves the amount to be set aside in writing and agrees to be responsible for all future expenses once the set aside funds are depleted.
While there is no requirement to establish a liability Medicare Set Aside, there is ample reason for evaluating whether one should be established. There are currently no guidelines, polices or procedures for Medicare Set Asides in non-Workers’ Compensation cases. Nevertheless, there are ways to insure that Medicare’s interests were addressed when settling with a Medicare beneficiary. The only known sure fire way to do this is with a Medicare Set Aside.
Planning for Medicaid or SSI Recipients
Unlike SSDI and Medicare, Supplemental Security Income (SSI) and Medicaid are income and asset sensitive public benefits that require planning to preserve. In Florida (and most states), one dollar of SSI benefits automatically brings Medicaid coverage. This is very important, as it is imperative to preserve some level of SSI benefits if Medicaid coverage is needed in the future. SSI is a cash assistance program administered by the Social Security Administration. It provides financial assistance to needy aged, blind, or disabled individuals. To receive SSI, the individual must be aged (65 or older), blind or disabled and be a U.S. citizen. The recipient must also meet the financial eligibility requirements.
Medicaid provides basic health care coverage for those who cannot afford it. It is a state and federally funded program run differently in each state. Eligibility requirements and services available vary by state. Medicaid can be used to supplement Medicare coverage if the client has both programs. For example, Medicaid can pay for prescription drugs as well as Medicare co-payments or deductibles.
A special needs trust (SNT) is required if the client is receiving Supplemental Security Income (SSI) or Medicaid. A SNT is a trust whose corpus or any assets held in the trust do not count as resources for purposes of qualifying for Medicaid or SSI. Thus a personal injury settlement can be placed into a SNT so that the victim can continue to qualify for SSI and Medicaid. Federal law authorizes and regulates the creation of a SNT. 42 U.S.C. §1396p(d)(4)(A)-(C) governs the creation and requirements for such trusts. First and foremost, a client must be disabled in order to create a SNT.
There are 3 primary types of trusts. First is the (d)(4)(A) trust which can only be established for those who are disabled and are under age 65. This trust is established with the personal injury victim’s settlement funds and is established for the victim’s own benefit. Second is a third party SNT which is established and funded by someone other than the personal injury victim (i.e., parent, grandparent, donations, etc. . .) for the benefit of the personal injury victim. The victim still must meet the definition of disability. Third is a (d)(4)(c) trust typically called a pooled trust that may be established by the injury victim with their own funds without regard to age restriction.
The Intersection of Medicare and Medicaid – SNT/MSA
If you have a client that is a Medicaid and Medicare recipient, extra planning may be in order. If it is determined that a Medicare Set Aside is appropriate, it raises some issues with continued Medicaid eligibility. A Medicare Set Aside account is considered an available resource for purposes of needs based benefits such as SSI/Medicaid. If the Medicare Set Aside account is not set up inside a Special Need Trust, the client will lose Medicaid/SSI eligibility. Therefore, in order for someone with dual eligibility to maintain their Medicaid/SSI benefits the MSA must be put inside a Special Needs Trust. In this instance you would have a hybrid trust which addresses both Medicaid and Medicare. It is a complicated planning tool but one that is essential when you have those with dual eligibility.
The Settlement Solutions National Pooled Trust has a sub-account which can be set up as a MSA. This means the assets in the MSA are inside of the pooled special needs trust protecting both Medicaid and Medicare eligibility. There must be a separate non-Medicare pooled special needs trust sub-account which holds monies to pay for the administrative costs and non-Medicare settlement funds. The Medicare Set Aside sub- account can only pay for Medicare covered services related to the injury and can’t be used to pay for any administrative expenses. All administrative expenses must come from the non-Medicare pooled trust sub-account.
To learn more about the Settlement Solutions National Pooled Trust click HERE
To learn more about the MSA sub-account click HERE
[i] Resources must be at or below twice the standard allowed under the Supplemental Security Income (SSI) program and income at or below 100% of the Federal poverty level.
[ii] Resources must be at or below twice the standard allowed under the SSI program and income exceeding the QMB level, but less than 120% of the Federal Poverty Level.
Some individuals are dual eligible. In plain English, this means they qualify for both Medicaid and Medicare. In certain cases, a Medicare Set Aside/Pooled Trust Sub-Account may be necessary to preserve the dual eligibility.
By Jason D. Lazarus, J.D., LL.M., MSCC, CSSC
On May 25th, the MSPRC temporarily suspended issuing demand letters. The suspension was apparently due to the Haro v. Sebelius decision from Arizona wherein Medicare was enjoined from certain collection practices. What ensued was a review and changes to its Rights and Responsibilities letters as well as its demand letters. On June 27th, Medicare resumed issuing demand letters and posted samples of the new letters on its website. The new letter contains a few notable changes.
- The first notable change is the addition of language relating to Medicare recovery actions while an appeal or waiver request is pending. The letter indicates that Medicare will not begin a recovery action when an appeal or waiver is pending. This is in conformity with the Haro decision.
- Second, there is language that has been added regarding avoidance of the assessment of interest. According to the letter, if a waiver or appeal is requested/filed then the responsible party may choose to repay Medicare the full amount or the amount it believes Medicare is owed within 60 days to avoid any interest. The letter does warn that “interest accrues on any unpaid balance, which may include any amount you are determined to owe once a decision is reached on your request for waiver of recovery or appeal.” Therefore if it is desired to avoid any interest at all, the full amount should be paid while the appeal/waiver request is pending. The letter does state that “if you receive a waiver of recovery or if you are successful in appealing our decision, Medicare will refund any excess amounts you have paid.” Again, this conforms with Haro.
- Third and last, is the addition of a notice provision procedure prior to a recovery action being instituted by Treasury. The letter states that if “Medicare intends to take collection action (including referral to Treasury), you will be provided with appropriate notice.” “This notice will include information concerning appropriate steps to avoid such actions.”
The changes are subtle but are nevertheless important. The process of resolving Medicare conditional payments is timely and isn’t cost effective for most personal injury firms. Synergy can help resolve Medicare conditional payments freeing up valuable times and resources to litigate/settle cases. Contact us today to see how we can help with lien resolution.
To view the new sample demand letter click HERE
To see other information on Medicare condtional payment recovery issues, visit the MSPRC’s website by clicking HERE
On June 27th, Medicare formally resumed issuing demand letters after it halted issuance in response apparently to the Haro v. Sebelius decision. I will summarize what is new in the demand letter.
By B. Joshua Pettingill & Jason D. Lazarus
The hiring of a Medicare Set Aside (“MSA”) allocation vendor is an important decision when settling a worker’s compensation or liability matter. The future medical costs included in the allocation report can make or break a case. If the MSA allocation is too high, it may hurt the chances of settling the case. If the allocation is too low due to improper calculation of the future medical care covered by Medicare, CMS is not going to approve the MSA. Failure to obtain CMS approval of an allocation can cause a contingent settlement to disintegrate.
Hiring the right MSA vendor is critical to successful conclusion of a case involving a Medicare beneficiary where an MSA will be implemented. Here are ten questions to help guide your decision making process when searching for a MSP compliance partner:
- Does the MSA allocation vendor do work for plaintiffs or insurance companies?
- Are the vendor’s owners & employees certified Medicare set aside consultants (MSCC)?
- What other qualifications and designations do their allocators have?
- Does the vendor have proper E & O coverage?
- Has vendor ever been sued as a result of the work performed?
- Does the vendor more than one person who reviews the MSA before the final report is completed?
- Does the vendor handle liability claims differently than worker’s compensation claims?
- What is their average turnaround time to hear back from CMS?
- What calculations are included in the analysis?
- Can they provide a funding analysis of the MSA using a structured settlement?
You should be very leery of vendors who make outrageous claims such as, “guaranteed acceptance by CMS”. There are MSA vendors who continue to market using these false claims. The problem with this practice is the MSA allocation amount may be overly inflated so CMS will approve it automatically. This can cost the insurance carrier more in terms of settlement dollars. More importantly, an overinflated MSA allocation amount will result in less upfront cash for the plaintiff.
You should also avoid MSA vendors who advertise “lowest defensible allocations”. When a MSA is prepared, there is a very strict methodology that must be employed to comply with CMS guidelines. If the MSA is being submitted to CMS for approval, the Medicare contractor evaluating the allocation is going to review all of the accompanying documentation for both medical treatment and prescriptions. If the allocation amount is too low, they are going to flag the report and revise the amount upward. Once that happens, you are at the mercy of CMS. There is no formal appeal process if CMS comes back with a significantly higher number in place of the artificially low number submitted by an MSA vendor.
A properly calculated MSA allocation should have a rational basis in the medical records and bills attributable to the injury related care prior to settlement. It is imperative to hire a firm who has the experience, knowledge and ability to guide you through all of the pre-settlement, settlement and post-settlement issues that may arise with Medicare Secondary Payer compliance. More importantly, the right experts can insure you and your client are fully protected so you do not have to worry about unforeseen litigation after the claim has been resolved.
To learn more about how Synergy can help with Medicare Secondary Payer compliance and Medicare Set Asides, click HERE.
The hiring of a Medicare Set Aside (“MSA”) allocation vendor is an important decision when settling a worker’s compensation or liability matter. The future medical costs included in the allocation report can make or break a case.
MSPRC Resolution Timeline*
CMS has revamped the Medicare recovery process, creating a more efficient and less questionable path for the verification of Medicare conditional payments. Based on a compilation of facts from www.MSPRC.info, Medicare Correspondence, and daily interaction with MSPRC, we have created a timeline to a serve as a general guide to the Medicare Resolution Process, and what can be expected by all parties entering a settlement with a possible Medicare obligation.
The following is an approximate timeline for the Medicare recovery process*:
- Day 1: Report to Coordination of Benefits Contractor (COBC) by calling 1(800)999-1118.
- Day 2 – 12: The case is transferred to the Medicare Secondary Payer Contractor (MSPRC) from the COBC within 2 weeks.
- Day 14-21: Within (7) days of the record being created in the MSPRC’s database, a Rights and Responsibility (RAR) letter will be sent to the beneficiary and their attorney.
- The MSPRC will begin their claim retrieval process, which takes approximately 8 weeks.
- Day 30 – 65: Effective October 1, 2009 the MSPRC will issue a conditional payment letter to the beneficiary and all authorized parties reflecting Medicare’s recovery amount within (65) days of the date of the RAR.
- An updated conditional payment amount can only be requested every 90 days.
- Day 66 – 95: Once all settlement information has been provided to the MSPRC, the demand should be issued within 10 – 30 days.
Synergy can assist in the resolution of Medicare liens. Contact us at info@synergysettlements.com or by calling us at (877)907-5436 for more information on how we can help.
*The estimated turnaround times for Medicare Conditional Payment summaries and Final Demands can vary and may be prolonged due to volume as a result of the newly implemented reporting requirements under MMSEA Section 111. Further instruction on the Medicare Secondary Payer process is found on www.msprc.info.
CMS has revamped the Medicare recovery process, creating a more efficient and less questionable path for the verification of Medicare conditional payments.
CMS has made the following updates to the MMSEA section of the CMS website: http://www.cms.gov/
September 30, 2010
- Posted the September 22, 2010 NGHP Town Hall Teleconference Transcript to the NGHP Transcripts section page.
- Moved the January 28, 2010 NGHP Town Hall Teleconference Transcript to the Mandatory Insurer Reporting section page under NGHP Transcripts.
- Moved the May 26, 2009 Alert: Compliance Guidance Regarding Obtaining Individual HICNs and/or SSNs for Group Health Plan from the What’s New section page to the GHP Alerts section page.
- Moved the August 24, 2009 – HICN, SSN Collection – NGHP Model Language from the What’s New section page to the NGHP section page.
- Moved the August 24, 2009 Alert – Compliance Guidance Regarding Obtaining Individual HICNs and/or SSNs for NGHP Reporting from the What’s New section page to the MMSEA 111 Alerts section page.
- Moved the May 27, 2010 – May 27, 2010 – Updating Language – ALERT For Liability Insurance (including Self-Insurance), No-Fault Insurance, and Workers’ Compensation RREs – Periodic Workers’ Compensation and No-Fault Payments from the What’s New section page to the MMSEA 111 Alerts section page.
Synergy can assist your firm with Medicare Compliance and understanding MMSEA Section 111 Reporting Requirements. Contact us today for more information on how we can benefit your firm! (877)907-5436 / info@synergysettlements.com.
CMS has made the following updates to the MMSEA section of the CMS website: http://www.cms.gov/mandatoryinsrep/04_whats_new.asp:
On February 8, 2006 President George Bush signed the Deficit Reduction Act (DRA) of 2005. Pursuant to Section 5001(c) of DRA the Secretary must identify the following conditions:“(a) high cost or high volume or both,
(b) result in the assignment of a case to a DRG that has a higher payment when present as a secondary diagnosis, and
(c) could reasonably have been prevented through the application of evidence-based guidelines.”
If any of the following conditions was not present at the time of admission additional payment will not be made by Medicare. In an attempt to enforce this rule CMS has created POA, which is a coding mechanism used to indicate when a HAC was present to prevent Medicare from being the responsible payer.
For FY 2009 the 10 categories of HACs include:
- Foreign Object Retained After Surgery
- Air Embolism
- Blood Incompatibility
- Stage III and IV Pressure Ulcers
- Falls and Trauma
- Fractures
- Dislocations
- Intracranial Injuries
- Crushing Injuries
- Burns
- Electric Shock
- Manifestations of Poor Glycemic Control
- Diabetic Ketoacidosis
- Nonketotic Hyperosmolar Coma
- Hypoglycemic Coma
- Secondary Diabetes with Ketoacidosis
- Secondary Diabetes with Hyperosmolarity
- Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection (UTI)
- Vascular Catheter-Associated Infection
- Surgical Site Infection Following:
- Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) – Mediastinitis
- Bariatric Surgery
- Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass
- Gastroenterostomy
- Laparoscopic Gastric Restrictive Surgery
- Orthopedic Procedures
- Spine
- Neck
- Shoulder
- Elbow
- Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT)/Pulmonary Embolism (PE)
- Total Knee Replacement
- Hip Replacement
CMS has opted to leave the list of HACs for FY 2010 unchanged. CMS will take this time to evaluate the program in order to assist with future decision making of the program.
Lien Settlement Solutions can assist your firm in understanding the changes in Medicare policies and guidelines. Call us today for more information on Medicare and Compliance at (877)907-5436 or email us at info@lienss.com. We are the Lawyer’s Complete Solution to Lien Resolution!
In CMS’ efforts to improve the quality of care, as of October 1, 2008 Medicare will not pay for certain injuries/conditions acquired during inpatient care, these injuries/conditions have been named by CMS as “never events” or “hospital acquired conditions” (HACs).
READY TO SCHEDULE A CONSULTATION?
The Synergy team will work diligently to ensure your case gets the attention it deserves. Contact one of our legal experts and get a professional review of your case today.